CTEPH EFFICACY + SAFETY RESULTS

Adempas is the first and only FDA-approved treatment for adults with inoperable/ recurrent CTEPH (WHO Group 4) after surgery.1

Video title

YYMMDD Author/Uploaded by
Watch

Dr. Andrew Pogozelski discuss the CHEST-1 and CHEST-2 studies.

Compensated by Bayer for video.

IF YOUR PATIENTS ARE NOT AT GOAL, CONSIDER ADEMPAS

Adempas demonstrated efficacy for CTEPH adult patients in both WHO Functional Class II and III by 3 parameters1

Exercise capacity

Improvement in 6MWD

WHO FC

Improvement in WHO FC

Hemodynamics

Improvement in PVR and NT-proBNP

6MWD=6-minute walking distance; CTEPH=chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension; NT-proBNP=N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide; PVR=pulmonary vascular resistance; WHO FC=World Health Organization Functional Class. 

CHEST STUDY DESIGN1,2

Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension Soluble Guanylate Cyclase–Stimulator Trial 1 (CHEST-1) was a randomized, double-blind, multinational, multicenter, placebo-controlled, 16-week phase 3 study.

Graphic showing CHEST study design for 261 CTEPH patients divided into Adempas group (173) and placebo group (83).

Baseline Characteristics

  • Mean age: 59 years (range: 18-80)
  • Mean 6MWD was 347 m
  • Concomitant medications: stable dosages of oral anticoagulants, diuretics, digitalis, calcium channel blockers, and oxygen were allowed, but not nitric oxide donors, endothelin receptor antagonists, prostacyclin analogues, specific PDE-5 inhibitors (such as sildenafil, tadalafil, or vardenafil), and nonspecific PDE inhibitors (for example, dipyridamole or theophylline)
Graphic showing patient population distribution in the CHEST study

The majority of patients were WHO FC II (31%) or III (64%) at baseline. Patients with systolic blood pressure <95 mm Hg were excluded.

CHEST-1 was a pivotal trial for inoperable or persistent/recurrent CTEPH (WHO Group 4) patients. 
PDE-5=phosphodiesterase type 5; PH=pulmonary hypertension; PTE=pulmonary thromboendarterectomy. 

Exercise Capacity (6MWD)

ADEMPAS SIGNIFICANTLY IMPROVED 6MWD AT WEEK 161

Results in CTEPH: 6MWD Over 16 Weeks

Line chart showing change in 6MWD over 16 weeks in patients with CTEPH, comparing Adempas versus placebo.

46 m

improvement (mean) in 6-minute walk distance (6MWD) over placebo at Week 16 (95% confidence interval (CI): 25 m-67 m; p<0.0001) for adults with CTEPH (WHO Group 4).

Patient Subgroups

CTEPH* PATIENTS WALKED FARTHER WITH ADEMPAS AT WEEK 161,3

Prespecified Subgroup: Mean Change From Baseline

Chart showing prespecified subgroup analysis of mean change from baseline in 6MWD for CTEPH patients treated with Adempas vs placebo.

WHO Functional Class Improvement

50% MORE PATIENTS IN THE ADEMPAS GROUP IMPROVED IN WHO FC VS PLACEBO AT WEEK 161

Change in WHO Functional Class in the 16-Week Trial

Bar chart showing change in WHO functional class over 16 weeks trial for CTEPH patients, comparing Adempas vs placebo.

2x

as many patients improved WHO FC vs placebo

Hemodynamics (PVR and NT-proBNP)

ADEMPAS IMPROVED PVR AND NT-proBNP AT WEEK 161,2‡

Change in Hemodynamic Parameters at Week 16

change in hemodynamic parameters at week 16

Of 261 randomized patients, right-heart catheterization was performed at the beginning and end of the study period in 233 patients.
Adempas, n=173; placebo, n=88

Long-Term Data

MORE THAN 90% OF ADEMPAS PATIENTS SURVIVED AT 2 YEARS

Probability of Survival Data for CTEPH Patients

§Data from CHEST-2 open-label extension study.

An open-label extension study (CHEST-2) included 237 patients who had completed CHEST-1.

At the cut-off date in the CHEST-2 study, the mean treatment duration for the total population was 1077 days (±433).

Without a control group, these data must be interpreted cautiously.

Graphic shows probability of survival data for CTEPH patients, indicating a 97% survival rate at 1 year and a 93% survival rate at 2 years.

Most Common Adverse Events

ADVERSE EVENTS THAT OCCURRED MORE FREQUENTLY (≥3%) ON ADEMPAS THAN PLACEBO (POOLED FROM CHEST-1 AND PATENT-1)1

most common adverse events

Other events that were seen more frequently in Adempas compared to placebo and potentially related to treatment were:

  • Palpitations
  • Nasal congestion
  • Epistaxis
  • Dysphagia
  • Abdominal distention
  • Peripheral edema
Medicine bottle icon

Help your patients take Adempas properly.

Learn more here.

IF YOUR PATIENTS ARE NOT AT GOAL, CONSIDER ADEMPAS

Adempas demonstrated efficacy for CTEPH adult patients in both WHO Functional Class II and III by 3 parameters1

excercise capacity

Improvement in 6MWD

WHO FC

Improvement in WHO FC

Hemodynamics

Improvement in PVR and NT-proBNP

6MWD=6-minute walking distance; CTEPH=chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension; NT-proBNP=N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide; PVR=pulmonary vascular resistance; WHO FC=World Health Organization Functional Class.

CHEST STUDY DESIGN1,2

Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension Soluble Guanylate Cyclase–Stimulator Trial 1 (CHEST-1) was a randomized, double-blind, multinational, multicenter, placebo-controlled, 16-week phase 3 study.

Cteph patients

Baseline Characteristics

  • Mean age: 59 years (range: 18-80)
  • Mean 6MWD was 347 m
  • Concomitant medications: stable dosages of oral anticoagulants, diuretics, digitalis, calcium channel blockers, and oxygen were allowed, but not nitric oxide donors, endothelin receptor antagonists, prostacyclin analogues, specific PDE-5 inhibitors (such as sildenafil, tadalafil, or vardenafil), and nonspecific PDE inhibitors (for example, dipyridamole or theophylline)

PATIENT POPULATION

72%

inoperable by PTE

(PVR >300 dyn·sec·cm-5 and mean pulmonary arterial pressure >25 mm Hg measured at least 90 days after the start of full anticoagulation)

28%

recurrent or persisting PH

(PVR >300 dyn·sec·cm-5 measured at least 180 days following PTE)

The majority of patients were WHO FC II (31%) or III (64%) at baseline. Patients with systolic blood pressure <95 mm Hg were excluded.

    Exercise Capacity (6MWD)
    ADEMPAS SIGNIFICANTLY IMPROVED 6MWD AT WEEK 161

    Results in CTEPH: 6MWD Over 16 Weeks

    Results in cteph 6mwd over 16 weeks

    46 m

    improvement (mean) in 6-minute walk distance (6MWD) over placebo at Week 16 (95% confidence interval (CI): 25 m-67 m; p<0.0001) for adults with CTEPH (WHO Group 4).

    Patient Subgroups
    CTEPH* PATIENTS WALKED FARTHER WITH ADEMPAS AT WEEK 161,3

    Prespecified Subgroup: Mean Change From Baseline

    prespecified subgroup mean change from baseline
    WHO Functional Class Improvement
    50% MORE PATIENTS IN THE ADEMPAS GROUP IMPROVED IN WHO FC VS PLACEBO AT WEEK 161

    Change in WHO Functional Class in the 16-Week Trial

    change in who functional class in the 16 week trial

    2x

    as many patients improved WHO FC vs placebo

    Hemodynamics (PVR and NT-proBNP)
    ADEMPAS IMPROVED PVR AND NT-proBNP AT WEEK 161,2‡

    Change in Hemodynamic Parameters at Week 16

    change in hemodynamic parameters at week 16

    Of 261 randomized patients, right-heart catheterization was performed at the beginning and end of the study period in 233 patients.

    Adempas, n=173; placebo, n=88.

    Long-Term Data
    MORE THAN 90% OF ADEMPAS PATIENTS SURVIVED AT 2 YEARS

    Probability of Survival Data for CTEPH Patients

    §Data from CHEST-2 open-label extension study.

    An open-label extension study (CHEST-2) included 237 patients who had completed CHEST-1.

    At the cut-off date in the CHEST-2 study, the mean treatment duration for the total population was 1077 days (±433).

    Without a control group, these data must be interpreted cautiously.

    Long term data
    Most Common Adverse Events
    ADVERSE EVENTS THAT OCCURRED MORE FREQUENTLY (≥3%) ON ADEMPAS THAN PLACEBO (POOLED FROM CHEST-1 AND PATENT-1)1
    most common adverse events

    Other events that were seen more frequently in Adempas compared to placebo and potentially related to treatment were:

    • Palpitations
    • Nasal congestion
    • Epistaxis
    • Dysphagia
    • Abdominal distention
    • Peripheral edema
    Medicine bottle icon

    Help your patients take Adempas properly.

    Learn more here.

     
    MORE IMPORTANT SAFETY INFORMATION LESS IMPORTANT SAFETY INFORMATION
    References:
    1. Adempas Prescribing Information. Whippany, NJ. Bayer Pharmaceuticals Inc., 2023.
    2. Ghofrani HA, D’Armini AM, Grimminger F, et al. Riociguat for the treatment of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(4):319-329.
    3. Clinical Study Report A62508. Data on File. Bayer HealthCare, Inc; Whippany, NJ.